IMO, it all depends on the number of people who believe in it. If enough people started believing in “The force” It could very well become a religion. Look at Agnosticism for example. It use to not be a religion, but they noticed allot of people representing that belief that it is now classified as a religion.
Philosophy are religion are different with their methods of inquiry. But their subject matter is almost the same. Philosophy inquires with the help of reason, religion with intuition.
In my opinion, philosophy ends with religion or fulfills religion. Human reason has a limit to explain the whole meaning of reality. Religion starts where philosophy stops. We need both religion and philosophy to have a dynamic view of life.
Zijn de Godsdienst en de Filosofie Twee Manieren om het Zelfde Ding Te doen?
Is de godsdienst enkel een type van filosofie? Is de filosofie een godsdienstige activiteit? Er schijnt wat verwarring af en toe over te zijn enkel of en hoe de godsdienst en de filosofie van elkaar â zouden moeten worden onderscheiden deze verwarring niet ongerechtvaardigd is omdat er sommige zeer sterke gelijkenissen tussen twee zijn.
De vragen die in zowel godsdienst als filosofie worden besproken neigen zeer gelijk te zijn. Zowel worstelen de godsdienst als de filosofie met problemen als: Wat goed is? Wat betekent het om het goed leven te leven? Wat is de aard van werkelijkheid? Waarom zijn hier wij en wat zouden wij moeten doen? Hoe zouden wij elkaar moeten behandelen? Wat werkelijk belangrijkst is in het leven?
Hoewel meeste godsdiensten en de geestelijke geloven zijn
duidelijk verschillend van wetenschap op zowel a
filosofisch en methodologisch niveau, twee
niet over het algemeen worden nagedacht om wederzijds te zijn
exclusief. Een meerderheid van mensen houdt een mengeling van allebei
wetenschappelijke en godsdienstige meningen. Het onderscheid
tussen filosofie en godsdienst, op andere
de hand, is af en toe minder duidelijk.
True philosophy Loves wise dominion (“wisdom”), within One Mind Soul-individuation.
True religion provides a routinized method for One Mind Soul-individuation, aka “let this Mind be with you, which was also with Christ Jesus.”
The routinization or energy-application in religion is along lines of Light given by true Prophets, a kind of causal Jacobean ladder, wherein genuine application effects genuine progress, as in-Formed by God.
With philosophy, awareness of process as praxis is more prominent, than with a more formulaic and trust-based religiosity, which is relying on in-Formed Energy-effectuality.
As with any type of human endeavor, there are levels, types, degrees of purity, and intersections among methods
For example, Edmund Husserl could discern a faith-based practitioner of phenomenology from one whose awareness had been transformed by genuine epoche. The former, when sincere, could perhaps be helped, but when opining they were “doing phenomenology,” were too often as the “invincibly ignorant.”
p.s.
The so-called infantile or superstitious behavior of some religious has a parallel expression in the “Gradgrind” or “headucated,” aka “learned,” who may quote chapter and verse, but who are not “walking the talk.” This is a kind of rote or “mechanization man,” well-profiled in Mark Prophet’s “The Soulless One.”
If a religious becomes fanatic, it is like an academic becoming pompous.
Martha Beck, Ph.D., in her “Expecting Adam,” and Sunyata, in his “Dancing with the Void,” demonstrate what Tibetan Buddhists term “chod,” or “cutting through material-spiritual density,” a kind of kamikaze, zenlike “pedal to the metal” “when push comes to shove” “necessity is the mother of invention” shtick. Saint Paul’s conversion experience is a more nuanced and guided version of such radical DOS (denial of (synthetic) self). It is a kind of transformation of infantile religious or pompous academic into the “real deal.” Sunyata’s way was more gentle, albeit truly radical.
The difference between philosophy and religion is a comitment. One has crossed into the realm of religion from philosophy when one has a personal stake in the answers to one’s questions – or a parameter/boundry which exists for them. These blinders exist for all of us within different questions and to different degrees.
IMO, it all depends on the number of people who believe in it. If enough people started believing in “The force” It could very well become a religion. Look at Agnosticism for example. It use to not be a religion, but they noticed allot of people representing that belief that it is now classified as a religion.
Philosophy are religion are different with their methods of inquiry. But their subject matter is almost the same. Philosophy inquires with the help of reason, religion with intuition.
In my opinion, philosophy ends with religion or fulfills religion. Human reason has a limit to explain the whole meaning of reality. Religion starts where philosophy stops. We need both religion and philosophy to have a dynamic view of life.
De filosofie wordt godsdienst wanneer de filosoof gedaane " is; thinking."
The line is named “Hypothesis”
Zijn de Godsdienst en de Filosofie Twee Manieren om het Zelfde Ding Te doen?
Is de godsdienst enkel een type van filosofie? Is de filosofie een godsdienstige activiteit? Er schijnt wat verwarring af en toe over te zijn enkel of en hoe de godsdienst en de filosofie van elkaar â zouden moeten worden onderscheiden deze verwarring niet ongerechtvaardigd is omdat er sommige zeer sterke gelijkenissen tussen twee zijn.
De vragen die in zowel godsdienst als filosofie worden besproken neigen zeer gelijk te zijn. Zowel worstelen de godsdienst als de filosofie met problemen als: Wat goed is? Wat betekent het om het goed leven te leven? Wat is de aard van werkelijkheid? Waarom zijn hier wij en wat zouden wij moeten doen? Hoe zouden wij elkaar moeten behandelen? Wat werkelijk belangrijkst is in het leven?
Hoewel meeste godsdiensten en de geestelijke geloven zijn
duidelijk verschillend van wetenschap op zowel a
filosofisch en methodologisch niveau, twee
niet over het algemeen worden nagedacht om wederzijds te zijn
exclusief. Een meerderheid van mensen houdt een mengeling van allebei
wetenschappelijke en godsdienstige meningen. Het onderscheid
tussen filosofie en godsdienst, op andere
de hand, is af en toe minder duidelijk.
Wanneer het een onderzoek ophoudt te zijn en om op een bepaald antwoord begint aan te dringen zoals zijnd " truth".
One perspective:
True philosophy Loves wise dominion (“wisdom”), within One Mind Soul-individuation.
True religion provides a routinized method for One Mind Soul-individuation, aka “let this Mind be with you, which was also with Christ Jesus.”
The routinization or energy-application in religion is along lines of Light given by true Prophets, a kind of causal Jacobean ladder, wherein genuine application effects genuine progress, as in-Formed by God.
With philosophy, awareness of process as praxis is more prominent, than with a more formulaic and trust-based religiosity, which is relying on in-Formed Energy-effectuality.
As with any type of human endeavor, there are levels, types, degrees of purity, and intersections among methods
For example, Edmund Husserl could discern a faith-based practitioner of phenomenology from one whose awareness had been transformed by genuine epoche. The former, when sincere, could perhaps be helped, but when opining they were “doing phenomenology,” were too often as the “invincibly ignorant.”
p.s.
The so-called infantile or superstitious behavior of some religious has a parallel expression in the “Gradgrind” or “headucated,” aka “learned,” who may quote chapter and verse, but who are not “walking the talk.” This is a kind of rote or “mechanization man,” well-profiled in Mark Prophet’s “The Soulless One.”
If a religious becomes fanatic, it is like an academic becoming pompous.
Martha Beck, Ph.D., in her “Expecting Adam,” and Sunyata, in his “Dancing with the Void,” demonstrate what Tibetan Buddhists term “chod,” or “cutting through material-spiritual density,” a kind of kamikaze, zenlike “pedal to the metal” “when push comes to shove” “necessity is the mother of invention” shtick. Saint Paul’s conversion experience is a more nuanced and guided version of such radical DOS (denial of (synthetic) self). It is a kind of transformation of infantile religious or pompous academic into the “real deal.” Sunyata’s way was more gentle, albeit truly radical.
Het korte antwoord is dit: De filosofie is gebaseerde logica; de godsdienst is gebaseerd geloof.
Twee zijn diametraal tegengesteld.
The difference between philosophy and religion is a comitment. One has crossed into the realm of religion from philosophy when one has a personal stake in the answers to one’s questions – or a parameter/boundry which exists for them. These blinders exist for all of us within different questions and to different degrees.