“You are the representative of whatever you represent.
I am the representative of whatever I represent.”
I am the representative of whatever I represent.”
Both science and philosophy try their best to refuse this.
Philosophy and science are the arts to say and conclude” I am not what I am”.
WHAT IS YOUR OPINION ON MY STATEMENT?
By: Are you a King of Justice?
About the Author:
Your comments are Ghstealt Philosophy
that is easy, your thoughts are refused, and i stand on your statment, or opinion. but only on one foot, shaking side to side,,,,
Are you a moron who doesn’t make any sense or are you so smart I can’t understand what you are saying? Can you try to explain it a little?
If science and philosophy refute your statements in some ways, there are at least as many ways in which they support your statements. “I am not what I am”? How do they say this- to you? There are many ways in which they say exactly the opposite.
Philosophy and science can be (and have been) used/manipulated to prove/approve/disprove/refute many points of view- though not necessarily to the satisfaction of one who would listen.
The limitations of our own languages and patterns of thought create cycles that are nearly impossible to break out of.
All is perception. All is real. All is fluid. All is solid.
There is no all.