<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schijnt de Filosofie zich aangezien de geschiedenis te ontwikkelen en te verbeteren gaat?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oceanofthought.com/philosophy/schijnt-de-filosofie-zich-aangezien-de-geschiedenis-te-ontwikkelen-en-te-verbeteren-gaat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oceanofthought.com/philosophy/schijnt-de-filosofie-zich-aangezien-de-geschiedenis-te-ontwikkelen-en-te-verbeteren-gaat/</link>
	<description>[ dive into the mind, where deep thoughts arise ]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:02:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: generousT</title>
		<link>http://oceanofthought.com/philosophy/schijnt-de-filosofie-zich-aangezien-de-geschiedenis-te-ontwikkelen-en-te-verbeteren-gaat/comment-page-1/#comment-6431</link>
		<dc:creator>generousT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oceanofthought.com/philosophy/schijnt-de-filosofie-zich-aangezien-de-geschiedenis-te-ontwikkelen-en-te-verbeteren-gaat/#comment-6431</guid>
		<description>Philosophy appears to develop in at least two settings:  first,  in the open with loud, contentious pronouncements by &quot;philosophers.&quot;  Second, as undercurrents of thought which surface well after creation by authors who often remain anonymous.  By these processes philosophy can change over time.  I cannot, however, conceive of criteria to determine if philosophy is &quot;improving.&quot;  That, I believe, is unknowable.  Your whole question is moot.  Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philosophy appears to develop in at least two settings:  first,  in the open with loud, contentious pronouncements by &#8220;philosophers.&#8221;  Second, as undercurrents of thought which surface well after creation by authors who often remain anonymous.  By these processes philosophy can change over time.  I cannot, however, conceive of criteria to determine if philosophy is &#8220;improving.&#8221;  That, I believe, is unknowable.  Your whole question is moot.  Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam G</title>
		<link>http://oceanofthought.com/philosophy/schijnt-de-filosofie-zich-aangezien-de-geschiedenis-te-ontwikkelen-en-te-verbeteren-gaat/comment-page-1/#comment-6430</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oceanofthought.com/philosophy/schijnt-de-filosofie-zich-aangezien-de-geschiedenis-te-ontwikkelen-en-te-verbeteren-gaat/#comment-6430</guid>
		<description>de geschiedenis schijnt zich te ontwikkelen en te verbeteren aangezien de filosofie gaat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>de geschiedenis schijnt zich te ontwikkelen en te verbeteren aangezien de filosofie gaat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

